You'll need the entire front fork assembly including wheel, fender, axle, triples, etc. $400 for all that is cheap.Redbarron said:Hey guys ^-^ Does $400.00 sound okay for a set of forks off a 2000 zrx1200?
What else do I need to install these on the Connie and is it really worth that kind of money?
Thank You
Redbarron said:Hey guys ^-^ Does $400.00 sound okay for a set of forks off a 2000 zrx1200?
What else do I need to install these on the Connie and is it really worth that kind of money?
Thank You
~snark~ guffawGFinCA said:Thanks, Rev, that's a high compliment coming from you.
As a start, here are the parts you'll need for the swap:
- Forks from a ZX9, model year 1994 thru 1997 model (B1 thru B4).
- Upper and lower triple clamps from a 1994 thru 1996 ZX7, or a lower triple clamp from a 1994 thru 1997 ZX9 and the upper triple clamp from a 1994 to 2003 ZX7. The ZX9 top triple is not recommended, as it will effectively lower the front another 1/2".
- Wheel, axle, speedo drive, and 320 mm rotors from a donor compatible with the ZX9, which includes the ZX11, ZZR1200, and mid-90's ZX7
- Calipers compatible with the ZX9. For the 1994 thru 1996 zx9 these would be 4 piston Tokicos or Nissins, and for the 1997 they would be 6 piston Tokicos.
- Some way of mounting handlebars to the ZX7 top triple clamp, since the ZX9 used clip-on handlebars, which would not clear the Concours tank. I bought some dirt bike handlebar risers that I adapted to the top triple clamp.
- A fender from a ZX9 or ZX7, or an adapted fender.
- A new lower stem bearing.
Rev Ryder said:I can't tell you the size of the tubes either, but a little more offset would be good and probably lighten up the handling a little. When you;re really flying, the stability is great, but in the tight stuff side to side transition could be faster and require a little less effort. It isn't bad, but it's not super easy. It IS solid feeling and when you're hot footing the twisties, the stiff action of really good, but the heavier steering isn't so great. Once you get her going down she'll go as far as you dare and she's content to stay there, but she's far from neutral. Straight line is hands off for a hundred miles. Her overall trail is about .4 longer than stock where yours is about the same amount less IIRC.
Well, I'll have to procure a new measuring device to get the other half, haven't seen a caliper around since making the last move. LOL Unless some C-14 guys wanted to go measure theirs. Anyways, thanks Gary for the measurement and input. I will be considering this.GFinCA said:I just measured the top of my tubes, and they're 52 mm. All the ZX7's with USD forks had the same top triple, AFAIK, so that's half the info
We ALL need purpose in our lives. Sorry you got stuck with me. :motonoises:GFinCA said:I live to mess with you! >
When you get around to thinking some more about this, let me know if you need any measurements. The only difference between the ZX7 triples and the ZX9 triples is the tube diameter of the tubes through the lower triple and the way the upper triple attaches to the stem.
BTW, the ZX7 with the bigger forks were model year '96 to 2001.
JS said:Gee, this started out as a "More Power" thread and quickly turned into a "fork" thread. If it turns back into a more power thread I'll jump in.
Redbarron said:Hello Guys:
My appologeze for morphing the thread into a suspension issue.
Steve That's an interesting idea but, unfortunatly part of the issue is that the stock springs are just junk so I will be replacing them with stiffer springs.
I have never heard of or dealt with emmulators so I will have to do some research on them.
As far as raising the forks I cannot go any higher without getting extended hoses,cables and harnesses.
Thank You for you're input